CSRD for Non-EU Companies: Who Is Affected and What to Do

Roughly 10,000 companies headquartered outside the European Union are expected to fall within the reach of European sustainability rules through their activity on the continent ^[5]. The CSRD for non-EU companies is one of the most misunderstood parts of the regime, because a business with no legal entity in Europe can still be caught through a subsidiary, a branch or a stock listing. This guide explains what the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive requires, which non-EU companies are affected, how the recent Omnibus simplification changed the thresholds, and how to prepare a compliant report without last-minute panic.

What the CSRD is and why it reaches beyond the EU

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive is the European framework that requires companies to disclose detailed information on their environmental and social impact, using the European Sustainability Reporting Standards. It replaces the older non-financial reporting regime and greatly widens the number of organisations that must publish audited sustainability data, expected to reach well over 50,000 companies in total ^[5].

The reason the CSRD for non-EU companies matters is that the directive follows economic activity rather than the location of a head office. A company based in the United States, the United Kingdom or Asia can be pulled into scope because it owns a large EU subsidiary, operates an EU branch above a turnover threshold, or has securities listed on an EU regulated market ^[6]. In that situation, the obligation can extend to the group as a whole, not just its European operations.

Which non-EU companies are affected

Three routes bring a non-EU company into scope. The first is a listing: any company with transferable securities admitted to trading on an EU regulated market is captured, subject to size criteria. The second is an EU subsidiary that qualifies as a large undertaking. The third is a significant EU branch. On top of these, a specific third-country regime applies to non-EU parent groups that generate substantial revenue in Europe ^[1].

The Omnibus simplification reform raised the thresholds for that third-country regime. A non-EU parent group now falls under the specific regime where it generates net turnover above 450 million euros in the EU and has either an EU subsidiary that is a large undertaking or an EU branch above the turnover threshold ^[2]. These figures replaced substantially lower thresholds, which means a share of previously in-scope businesses is now excluded, while the largest global groups remain firmly captured ^[4].

What non-EU companies must report

Companies caught through an EU subsidiary or branch report against the standard European Sustainability Reporting Standards, the same detailed rules that apply to EU companies, covering climate, pollution, water, biodiversity, workforce, communities and governance. A structured carbon inventory across scopes 1, 2 and 3 sits at the centre of the climate disclosure.

For the specific third-country regime, the European Commission is developing a dedicated set of standards, often called the NESRS, tailored to non-EU parent groups. These standards are lighter than the full ESRS but still require the group to disclose sustainability information covering the whole entity, including operations outside Europe, rather than only its EU footprint ^[1]. A non-EU parent with several in-scope EU subsidiaries can generally file a single consolidated report at group level rather than one report per subsidiary ^[6]. Building reliable GHG Protocol accounting is the practical foundation of that disclosure.

The reporting timeline after the Omnibus reform

The Omnibus simplification package reshaped both the thresholds and the calendar. For the specific third-country regime, non-EU parent groups are required to report in line with the dedicated standards for financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2028, with the first reports published the following year ^[1]. A US parent company with qualifying European operations, for example, would report on that first covered financial year at consolidated group level, including its non-EU activity ^[5].

The reform also postponed and narrowed several waves of the wider CSRD, giving companies additional preparation time while keeping the direction of travel intact ^[3]. The clear message for non-EU groups is that simplification reduced the number of companies in scope and delayed some deadlines, but did not remove the obligation for large international groups active in Europe.

How to prepare: a practical roadmap

The first step is a scoping assessment: mapping every EU subsidiary, branch and listing to determine whether, and through which route, the group is caught. Many non-EU companies discover they are in scope through an entity they had not associated with sustainability reporting. The second step is a double materiality analysis, identifying which sustainability topics are material both to the business and to its stakeholders, since this drives what must actually be disclosed.

From there, the work becomes a data exercise. The group needs auditable figures on greenhouse gas emissions, energy, workforce and value chain impacts, gathered consistently across entities and jurisdictions. Because sustainability reports under the directive require external assurance, the underlying data has to withstand an audit. Non-EU groups that treat the reporting delay as breathing room to build robust data systems, rather than as a reason to wait, are the ones that avoid a scramble when the first covered financial year arrives.

CSRD and non-EU media groups and productions

The media, entertainment and events sector is directly exposed to the CSRD for non-EU companies. Global media groups, streaming platforms and studios headquartered outside Europe frequently run large EU subsidiaries and production hubs, which is exactly the structure that triggers scope. A non-EU broadcaster with a significant European production arm may find that its climate disclosure has to reflect the footprint of shoots, studios and events across the continent.

For these groups, the operational challenge is the value chain. An audiovisual production generates most of its footprint in scope 3, spread across crew travel, freight, catering, set construction and hired services from dozens of suppliers on tight schedules . Aggregating that data across many productions into a group-level, audit-ready disclosure is difficult with spreadsheets alone. Sector frameworks such as Albert and the resources of the Ecoprod collective help structure production-level measurement, but the reporting still needs a reliable data pipeline.

GreenPro, the carbon tracking tool from TheGreenshot, automates data collection for productions and events and generates footprints aligned with the Albert standard, the CSRD and the GHG Protocol, without manual entry. For a non-EU group consolidating dozens of European productions, that automation is what turns scattered supplier data into a defensible CSRD climate disclosure. Learn more about GreenPro.

Conclusion

The CSRD for non-EU companies rests on a simple principle: significant economic activity in Europe brings sustainability reporting obligations, wherever the parent is based. The Omnibus reform raised the thresholds and pushed back the calendar, so fewer businesses are caught and large groups gain time, but the obligation itself remains for major international players with EU subsidiaries, branches or listings. Companies that map their exposure early, run a serious double materiality analysis and invest in auditable emissions data will meet the first covered financial year prepared rather than exposed. As the dedicated third-country standards are finalised, non-EU groups active in Europe should treat CSRD readiness as a strategic requirement, not a distant formality.

FAQ

Going further with TheGreenshot