The world’s industrial greenhouse gas emissions largely come from just 100 energy companies that produce more than 70% of the total industrial greenhouse gas emissions . This reality explains why greenhouse gas accounting is a vital business practice for organizations of all sizes. U.S. greenhouse gas emissions reached 6,343 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents in 2022 . Industrial emissions in all sectors have grown by 62% over the last three decades .
Companies can measure and track their greenhouse gas emissions through GHG accounting’s well-laid-out methods . The practice has become more common to more people. CDP received climate disclosures from more than 18,700 companies in 2022. This number shows a 42% increase from 2021 and stands 233% higher than the Paris Agreement’s signing in 2015 . Reporting patterns show notable differences between emission types. While 81% of S&P 500 companies reported Scope 1 and 2 emissions in 2020 , only about 30% of U.S. companies tackled the more complex Scope 3 emissions in 2022 .
This straightforward piece helps businesses understand greenhouse gas accounting’s basics, methods and importance as they handle environmental responsibilities in 2025 and beyond.
What is Greenhouse Gas Accounting?
Greenhouse gas accounting helps organizations measure their climate impact. Like a financial ledger tracks dollars and cents, GHG accounting creates a complete record of emissions from business operations [1]. This is the quickest way to let companies, governments, and people measure their environmental footprint in a consistent, comparable format.
Definition in simple terms
Greenhouse gas accounting works as a formal system to track and audit the greenhouse gases that organizations produce during their business activities [2]. These emissions are measured in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO₂e). This unit converts all greenhouse gases into a single measurement based on their effect compared to carbon dioxide [1]. Such conversion makes comparing and analyzing different types of emissions easier.
The GHG Protocol, created in 2001, remains the most accessible framework to measure emissions worldwide [3]. This standard approach breaks down emissions into three main scopes:
-
Scope 1: Direct emissions from sources owned or controlled by the company
-
Scope 2: Indirect emissions from purchased electricity, heat, or steam
-
Scope 3: All other indirect emissions occurring in the value chain [2]
Difference between GHG and carbon accounting
People often use these terms interchangeably, but they mean different things. Carbon accounting tracks only carbon dioxide emissions, while greenhouse gas accounting includes all greenhouse gases like methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases [1].
The relationship works this way: carbon accounting always counts as GHG accounting, but GHG accounting doesn’t always focus just on carbon [1]. Many organizations actually do GHG accounting even when they say “carbon accounting” because they usually track several greenhouse gases besides carbon dioxide [4].
The GHG Protocol uses “greenhouse gas accounting” instead of “carbon footprinting” because non-carbon greenhouse gases should be part of complete emissions assessments [3]. This difference matters most in industries where non-carbon GHGs make up much of their environmental effect.
Why it’s more than just a number
GHG accounting brings value way beyond the reach and influence of simple emissions figures. The World Business Council for Sustainable Development says that people must interpret GHG accounting’s data effectively—like understanding a financial metric such as a credit score [5]. Raw emissions numbers mean little until analyzed within climate-related risks and organizational performance.
On top of that, GHG accounting:
-
Finds ways to cut emissions and save costs through better efficiency [4]
-
Builds trust with investors, customers, and other stakeholders through clear reporting [4]
-
Creates the foundation for both voluntary and mandatory corporate emissions disclosure [4]
-
Helps meet growing regulatory requirements [1]
-
Makes shared goal-setting and progress tracking toward climate commitments possible [1]
GHG accounting goes beyond environmental concerns. Carbon management professionals note that real-life climate action planning should assess how climate policies affect people’s lives. This connects emissions data to public health impacts and job creation [6]. Such a point of view turns GHG accounting from a purely environmental task into a tool that creates complete sustainability strategies.
How GHG Accounting Works
Greenhouse gas accounting needs two basic components: complete data collection and reliable data processing methods [7]. Companies that want to measure their effect on climate can choose from several calculation approaches. Each approach has its own benefits and uses.
Spend-based method explained
The spend-based method turns financial data into emissions estimates by using specific emission factors for money spent. This method multiplies the money spent on goods or services by emission factors—the amount of emissions created per financial unit [7]. To name just one example, when a company spends $10,000 on business travel with an emission factor of 0.25 kg CO₂e per dollar, they create 2,500 kg CO₂e [8].
This method uses environmentally extended input-output (EEIO) models to track resource flows between economic sectors [7]. The calculation formula is simple:
CO₂e emissions = Sum of (value of purchased good/service × emission factor per unit of economic value) [3]
Companies use the spend-based method when they can’t use supplier-specific, hybrid, or average-data methods because of limited data [3]. The biggest advantage is easy access to financial data through enterprise resource planning systems, purchasing records, or bills of materials [3].
Activity-based method explained
The activity-based method gives more precise results by looking at specific operational activities and their direct emissions. Instead of using financial transactions, this approach collects detailed data about physical activities throughout a company’s value chain [7].
Companies can use this method by finding key emission-generating processes, gathering specific activity data (like fuel consumption, production volumes, or miles traveled), using standard emission factors, and studying results [9]. For example, instead of calculating based on money spent on fuel, they measure actual liters used [7].
This method offers several benefits:
-
More accurate than estimation methods
-
Better management of reduction efforts through specific activity changes
-
Smarter decisions about sustainability investments [9]
Why a hybrid approach is best
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol suggests using a hybrid methodology that combines both approaches [9]. This practical strategy blends spend-based and activity-based methods to balance completeness with accuracy [7].
Companies can collect as much activity-based data as possible from their value chain and fill gaps with spend-based estimates [7]. Carbon management experts point out that about 90% of supply chain emissions are scope 3, which makes this balanced method valuable for complete accounting [10].
The hybrid methodology has several key advantages:
-
Strategic prioritization: Companies can focus their data collection on emissions hotspots that provide the most valuable insights [1]
-
Balanced view: Top-down measurements give a complete picture of total emissions while bottom-up data provides specific details for targeted reduction efforts [1]
-
Practical implementation: Major emission sources use activity-based methods, while harder-to-measure activities can use spend-based accounting [9]
-
Better reliability: Using both methods improves data accuracy and fills gaps in emissions reporting [10]
The balanced approach helps organizations create consistent, mature emissions inventories that get support from all departments [1]. It also helps develop targeted carbon reduction strategies for tier 1 suppliers, procurement, logistics, and product design [1].
Companies looking to understand their climate effect in 2025 will find this hybrid methodology the quickest way to accurate, complete greenhouse gas accounting.
Understanding Emission Scopes
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol splits emissions into three categories that are the foundations of complete greenhouse gas accounting. Organizations can identify their climate effects and create targeted reduction strategies by understanding these scopes.
Scope 1: Direct emissions
Scope 1 includes direct greenhouse gas emissions from sources that organizations own or control [11]. These emissions fall into four categories: stationary combustion (like boilers and furnaces), mobile combustion (company-owned vehicles), fugitive emissions (unintentional leaks often from refrigeration systems), and process emissions from industrial activities [12].
Heavy industries such as oil and gas, chemicals, and manufacturing see scope 1 emissions as the largest part of their carbon footprint [12]. These emissions fall under direct operational control and offer immediate opportunities to reduce through equipment upgrades, process improvements, or fuel switching.
Scope 2: Indirect energy emissions
Scope 2 covers indirect emissions that come from purchased energy the reporting company uses [13]. These emissions happen at facilities that produce electricity, steam, heating, or cooling – not where they’re consumed [6].
Most organizations get their scope 2 emissions from electricity [14]. Scope 2 emissions stand out because they have market-based mechanisms that let companies reduce emissions through strategic procurement choices [5].
Scope 3: Value chain and beyond
Scope 3 covers all other indirect emissions throughout a company’s value chain, both upstream and downstream [13]. Activities not owned or controlled by the reporting organization create these emissions, yet they connect to its operations [14].
Companies don’t have to report scope 3 emissions under the GHG Protocol, but these usually make up the biggest part of their carbon footprint. Companies that only address scopes 1 and 2 miss major reduction opportunities. Kraft Foods found that value chain emissions made up more than 90% of its total emissions [13].
Why Scope 3 is the hardest to track
Tracking scope 3 emissions creates unique challenges because their sources exist outside a company’s operational boundaries [15]. The biggest problems include:
-
Poor data quality and availability, especially from smaller suppliers [15]
-
Disclosure standards that keep changing and need expert interpretation [15]
-
Stakeholder involvement issues, including confidentiality concerns [15]
-
Limited resources to process large volumes of emissions data [15]
All the same, scope 3 remains crucial. Companies see scope 3 emissions account for about 88% of their total business emissions [15]. A PwC study showed that 80% of an organization’s supply chain emissions come from just one-fifth of its purchases [4].
Companies often start by estimating emissions using industry averages or proxies because of these challenges [2]. They use more primary data over time as they build stronger supplier relationships and improve their data collection systems.
Why GHG Accounting Matters in 2025
Greenhouse gas accounting reaches a turning point in 2025. Businesses worldwide now see environmental priorities as essential practices rather than optional initiatives. Companies place emissions measurement at the heart of their corporate strategy, risk management, and stakeholder relations.
Helps meet climate goals
GHG accounting creates the foundations for global climate action. Global greenhouse gas emissions must drop by almost half by 2030 and reach net zero [16]. Companies cannot identify reduction opportunities or meaningfully contribute to these targets without standardized measurement methods. Organizations can set science-based targets and verify their progress toward these commitments through complete emissions tracking [17]. The numbers tell a clear story – 61% of companies that track their carbon footprint yearly have set public goals and started working toward them [18].
Builds trust with investors and customers
Stakeholder confidence in 2025 depends heavily on transparent emissions reporting. ESG factors now shape investment decisions more than ever. Strong GHG accounting practices show sustainability commitment and improve ESG ratings [3]. Companies gain investor trust and better access to capital through this transparency. They might even secure lower financing costs where climate-related risks matter significantly [3]. Clear emissions reporting also boosts brand reputation among eco-conscious consumers and partners, creating a competitive edge [7].
Supports regulatory compliance
Emissions reporting regulations will have grown extensively by 2025. California’s Climate Disclosure Accountability Act requires businesses with revenues over $1 billion to disclose their scope 1 and 2 emissions from 2026, followed by scope 3 reporting in 2027 [16]. SB 253 mandates the first GHG emissions reports with limited assurance for scope 1 and 2 emissions by June 2026 [8]. The European Sustainability Reporting Standards now cover at least 50,000 companies across the European Union [16].
Drives internal sustainability improvements
GHG accounting offers real business benefits beyond compliance. Companies can spot operational inefficiencies, optimize supply chains, and cut costs while reducing their carbon footprint by analyzing emissions data [18]. This approach helps manage climate-related risks, including physical threats to assets and supply chain disruptions that could significantly affect finances [3]. The old saying rings true – what gets measured gets managed. Emissions accounting helps find the most effective ways to reduce environmental impact while driving materials and energy efficiency [19].
Tools and Standards for GHG Accounting
Companies that want to measure how they affect the climate use time-tested frameworks and digital tools to track their emissions.
GHG Protocol and ISO 14064
Two major standards lead greenhouse gas accounting worldwide. The GHG Protocol, which the World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development created together, stands as the most used standard for corporate greenhouse gas accounting [20]. The ISO 14064 standard provides a technical framework with detailed rules for measurement and reporting [21].
These two leading standards made a breakthrough partnership in 2025 to align their existing systems and create new standards together [20]. This merger brings together standards from the ISO 1406X family and the GHG Protocol’s Corporate Accounting, Scope 2, and Scope 3 Standards into one unified set of international standards [22]. The partnership wants to make processes easier for companies and create more consistency for policymakers by building a “common global language for emissions accounting” [20].
Popular software tools in 2025
Today’s carbon accounting platforms have grown from simple calculation tools into detailed solutions that:
-
Let companies collect data and calculate emissions automatically [9]
-
Help meet rules set by SECR and CSRD frameworks [9]
-
Create insights that help reach long-term climate goals [9]
-
Merge with existing business systems like ERPs and procurement tools [23]
Top platforms in 2025 include specialized tools that focus on investor-grade reporting, supplier emissions tracking, and cross-functional accountability [23].
Choosing the right tool for your business
These factors matter when picking GHG accounting software:
-
How well it lines up with known standards (GHG Protocol, ISO 14064) [24]
-
Knowing how to handle current and future emission sources as your company grows [24]
-
Ways it can connect with your existing data sources [9]
-
Support for industry-specific reporting rules [9]
-
Quality of setup help and ongoing support [9]
Conclusion
Greenhouse gas accounting has transformed from a voluntary initiative into a crucial part of business by 2025. Companies understand that measuring emissions accurately builds the foundation for meaningful climate action. They can’t manage what they don’t measure.
A hybrid methodology combines spend-based and activity-based approaches, which, without doubt, delivers the most detailed and accurate emissions assessment. This balanced approach lets businesses prioritize their resources effectively and maintain data integrity across all three emission scopes. Global regulatory requirements continue to expand, and strong accounting practices help companies remain competitive instead of rushing to catch up.
Scope 3 emissions create major tracking challenges but make up much of an organization’s carbon footprint. Companies focusing only on Scopes 1 and 2 miss big opportunities to reduce emissions and mitigate risks.
The GHG Protocol and ISO 14064 have worked together to simplify reporting processes. Specialized software tools now make data collection and analysis quick and easy. Companies using these frameworks set themselves up for long-term success. They can identify operational inefficiencies, optimize supply chains, and implement affordable measures, among other emissions reductions.
A business’s future depends on responsible environmental stewardship. Greenhouse gas accounting provides organizations with the numbers they need to set meaningful targets, track real progress, and show their commitment to stakeholders. Companies that become skilled at this crucial practice will be ready for an increasingly carbon-constrained economy while helping the urgent global effort to curb climate change.
Key Takeaways
Understanding and implementing greenhouse gas accounting is no longer optional for businesses—it’s essential for navigating regulatory requirements, stakeholder expectations, and climate action in 2025.
• GHG accounting measures all greenhouse gasses (not just carbon) across three scopes, with Scope 3 representing up to 90% of most companies’ emissions despite being hardest to track.
• A hybrid approach combining spend-based and activity-based methods delivers the most accurate and comprehensive emissions assessment while balancing data quality with practical implementation.
• Regulatory compliance is driving adoption, with California requiring emissions disclosure for companies over $1B revenue and the EU mandating reporting for 50,000+ companies.
• Effective GHG accounting identifies cost-saving opportunities through operational efficiency improvements while building investor trust and supporting science-based climate targets.
• The 2025 partnership between GHG Protocol and ISO 14064 creates unified global standards, while specialized software tools now automate data collection and regulatory reporting.
What gets measured gets managed—companies that master greenhouse gas accounting today position themselves for success in an increasingly carbon-constrained economy while contributing meaningfully to global climate goals.
FAQs
Q1. Why is greenhouse gas accounting important for businesses? Greenhouse gas accounting is crucial for businesses as it helps identify opportunities to reduce emissions, improve operational efficiency, and cut costs. It also builds trust with investors and customers, supports regulatory compliance, and enables companies to set and track meaningful climate goals.
Q2. What’s the difference between carbon accounting and greenhouse gas accounting? While often used interchangeably, carbon accounting specifically focuses on tracking carbon dioxide emissions, whereas greenhouse gas accounting encompasses all greenhouse gases, including methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases. GHG accounting provides a more comprehensive picture of an organization’s environmental impact.
Q3. How does the hybrid approach to GHG accounting work? The hybrid approach combines spend-based and activity-based methods for GHG accounting. It involves collecting as much activity-based data as possible from the value chain and supplementing gaps with spend-based estimates. This balanced method provides a comprehensive overview while allowing for targeted reduction efforts in specific areas.
Q4. Why is Scope 3 emissions tracking challenging for companies? Scope 3 emissions, which occur in a company’s value chain, are the most difficult to track because they lie beyond the organization’s direct control. Challenges include poor data quality from suppliers, evolving disclosure standards, stakeholder engagement issues, and resource constraints for processing large volumes of emissions data.
Q5. What should companies consider when choosing GHG accounting software? When selecting GHG accounting software, companies should consider factors such as alignment with recognized standards (like GHG Protocol and ISO 14064), ability to handle current and future emission sources, integration capabilities with existing data systems, support for relevant regulatory reporting requirements, and quality of implementation support and ongoing service.
Our carbon experts help production studios frame strategy, train teams and track results — tailored to operational constraints.
